Down the stretch, opposition "Momentum" leaves Chavez "on the defensive"

Friday, October 5, 2012
Tal Cual Digital (3 Oct 2012)YV Polis (3 Oct 2012)
BLUF: 
As the Capriles camp rallied behind the surprisingly close race approaching the 7 October vote, a cancer-stricken Chavez unleashed another wave of hyperbole in the state media. Strikingly, this new enthusiasm from the opposition suggests even a loss Sunday may not derail their optimism for finally “reclaiming” their country in the near future.
OBSERVED: 
With challenger Henrique Capriles either tied or closing in the polls (depending on your preferred source), opposition media sources in Venezuela have undergone of surge of optimism revolving around their candidate’s “momentum.” In response to this apparent tightening of the race down the stretch, incumbent (and still favorite) Hugo Chavez has unleashed an increasingly hyperbolic wave of headlines from his massive state media apparatus, leaving many surprised that he is suddenly "on the defensive."

While Chavez still maintains a lead in average poll numbers, the fiercely anti-Bolivarian Tal Cual echoed the opposition rally cry as it touted the "technical tie" reported by generally well-regarded pollsters Consultores21 and Varianzas that is "feeding the hope" of a Capriles victory. After the enthusiasm of their February primary turned to the despair of a sluggish campaign in early summer, the perception that Capriles' relatively under-the-radar, house-to-house strategy [see our 30 May analysis, "Henrique Capriles and the Quiet Campaign"] was showing results at just the right time has led to a new wave of optimism from both traditional and social media sources among the opposition. The second image above, from the YV Polis blog, draws from the most widely-used polling firms to depict this statistical surge in the last three months vis-à-vis the “stagnation” of Chavez's support in the mid-40s. The blog reflects the opposition's hope in Chavez's failure to crack the 50 percent barrier. Chavez's detractors even saw potential defeat in a new light, with El Nacional suggesting that any progress in the final tally would be evidence of an inexorable demographic shift underway in Venezuela. Likewise, Tal Cual argued that even just forcing Chavez to sweat out a tight race would give Capriles more opportunities to "reinforce his leadership" and corner the president into engaging an opposition "that he [currently] ignores even though it has increased its presence in essential political spaces."

In response, Chavez has turned to its control of the nearly all-encompassing state media, unleashing a wave of sensational headlines with a noticeable increase (even for his administration) in hyperbole and appeals to emotion. Far removed from the arrogance of his mid-summer leave, when flagship daily Correo del Orinoco's top headline crowed "Chavez leads Capriles by 27.3 percent," the same outlet's top billing on 3 October featured an atypically nervous-sounding Chavez who "promised to be a better president than I have been." An article from El Nacional entitled, “Capriles monopolized the streets, Chavez the screen,” broke down the two distinct campaigns strategies. Citing Chavez’s health factor, the piece noted the president's campaign trips outside the city had dropped from 40 in 2006 to 28 in 2012, and highlighted his use of presidential addresses to coopt and “interrupt the transmission” of Capriles events and speeches--effectively bullying his rival off the airwaves--“on at least eight occasions.” This shift in rhetoric and tactics over the past three months led El Nacional to conclude "Capriles has achieved what appeared impossible, he has put Hugo Chavez on the defensive."

ASSESSMENT: 
Voter turnout is almost unanimously pinpointed as the major variable in this election. The main driving question in opposition blogs days ahead of the election is whether voting “against Chavez” versus being truly inspired by Capriles is sufficient motivation for their target electorate. Tabbed by most polls as the favorite, Chavez’s health has required him to run his campaign primarily via his control of the massive state media apparatus, with his brief and limited public appearances offer a sharp contrast to Capriles' “house by house” strategy. While this has seemingly allowed Capriles to make tangible inroads to traditionally chavista sectors of society, his restricted presence in mainstream media has clearly allowed Chavez to shape the election narrative with the public, with his allegations receiving blanket coverage while Capriles’ attempted refutations go unreported.
The sudden surge in optimism spurred by Capriles reported “momentum” approaching election day also triggered widespread media “spot reports” on the attitude of the street. However, given the stark financial and logistical gap between the two campaigns, it is difficult to quantify such anecdotal evidence on attitudes. In addition to the intimidation factor, the Chavez campaign simply has more funds (and more malleable state workers) to paper more neighborhoods with campaign paraphernalia.
Perhaps most damaging for the Chavez regime, Capriles' perceived surge has raised opposition optimism about the post-election future even should they lose, opening the window for a political “moral victory." Especially following their 2010 legislative election gains, a close presidential election would signal concrete gains in public support for the opposition, even if not yet translating to immediate political access. Coupled with increasing recognition of Chavez’s deteriorating health, regime opponents hope they are better-positioned to “reclaim” the country once he has exited the stage. The opposition now believes demographic changes in the country favor their camp, and the idea that the Venezuelan military is not as fervently chavista as portrayed by the current regime was reinforced by Capriles’ announcement that an active officer had agreed to serve as his Minister of Defense. The regime's wish to stamp out the opposition's recent spark may not be realized with anything less than a crushing victory on 7 October.